Investigating a Surface Science Mystery: The Case of the
Disappearing Monolayer
K. S. Schneider1, T. M.
Owens1, D. R. Fosnacht1, B. G.
Orr2,3 and M. M. Banaszak
Holl1,3 1Chemistry Department, The
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; 2Physics
Department and the 3Applied Physics Program, Harrison M.
Randall Laboratory, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
A recent X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning
tunneling microscopy (STM) investigation of an alkylsilane-based
monolayer has yielded intriguing chemical and physical phenomena. In
particular, oxidation of an octylsilane
(C8H17SiH3) monolayer chemisorbed
to Au(111) via ambient atmosphere exposure yields two surprising
results. First, the Au(111)-23×√3 surface reconstruction typical of
a clean gold surface spontaneously regenerates underneath the
oxidized (alkylsiloxane) monolayer. Furthermore, the physisorbed
alkylsiloxane monolayer is completely transparent to STM
imaging.
Frequently, the STM image contrast mechanism
of organized organics—such as alkanethiols—on Au(111) is explained
as a consequence of hydrocarbon chain crystallization and/or
variations in chain angle or orientation. Similarly, subtle
variations in alkyl chain angle or orientation may yield differing
apparent heights of alkylsilane monolayer features as observed by
STM. However, a recent XPS and STM investigation of an alkylsilane
monolayer prior to and following oxidation suggests the alkyl chains
are “transparent” to STM imaging and impart a negligible contrast
contribution to the STM images.
A STM image of clean Au(111) displays the parallel striped
features intrinsic to the 23×√3 surface reconstruction (Figure
1a). Monolayer formation via exposure of Au(111)-23×√3 to a
saturating gaseous pressure of octylsilane
(C8H17SiH3) in ultrahigh vacuum
(UHV) yields a complex pattern of interwoven, sinuous ridge features
containing numerous interstitial Au islands 20 – 40 Å in diameter
(Figure 1b). The presence and quantity of the Au islands (~7%
areal coverage in Figure 1b) indicates the underlying 23×√3
surface reconstruction has fully relaxed to the unreconstructed
Au(111)-1×1 phase.

Oxidation of the octylsilane monolayer via ambient atmosphere
exposure results in the disappearance of monolayer features from the
STM image (Figure 1c). The resulting substrate terraces are
indistinguishable from clean Au(111)-23×√3 (having identical lateral
and vertical dimensions) under the imaging conditions employed. STM
image features of the exposed monolayer do not vary with changes in
tunneling current (0.01 – 2 nA) or applied sample bias (± 2 V).
However, exposure to additional octylsilane does not regenerate the
image shown in Figure 1b. Instead, an image identical to
clean Au(111)-23×√3 remains (Figure 1d). Therefore, the
“clean gold” surface displayed in Figure 1c does not have
identical chemical properties of the authentic clean gold surface
illustrated in Figure 1a. On the basis of STM data alone,
this set of results was mysterious!
Direct chemical analysis of oxidized sample
surfaces have been performed using soft X-ray photoemission
spectroscopy (SXPS) at beamline U8B at the National Synchrotron
Light Source at Brookhaven National Laboratory. Beamline U8B is
perfectly suited to obtain the high-resolution Si 2p core-level
needed for this study as well as the valence band region. Note that
due to the presence of an Au plasmon trailing the Au 4f core level,
conventional XPS of the Si 2p core-level for these monolayers
provides no information. Following exposure to ambient atmosphere,
the Si 2p core level of the unoxidized octylsilane monolayer
(Figure 2a) shifts by 2.3 eV to higher binding energy and the
peak full width at half-maximum (fwhm) increases (Figure 2b).
The binding energy shift and peak broadening indicate formation of a
cross-linked RSiO3 and/or
(ROSiO1.5)n network. The C 2s features arising
from the octyl chain are retained in the valence band data (-12 to
-20 eV), indicating the presence of intact alkyl chains in the
oxidized monolayer (Figure 2d). In summary, the XPS data
indicate exposure to ambient atmosphere effectively oxidizes the
silicon head-groups; however, all of the silicon and alkyl
chains are retained within the oxidized monolayer. Thus, the STM
image displayed in Figure 1c does indeed have the monolayer
present, albeit it in an oxidized form.
The combination of SXPS and STM data suggest the original
octylsilane monolayer image in Figure 1b is the result of
significant mixing of Au and Si states. Oxidation of the Si
head-groups removes this interaction, causing the underlying
substrate to regenerate the Au(111)-23×√3 surface reconstruction,
and leaving only the Au states to image. In this case, the alkyl
chains are “transparent” in both Figures 1b and 1c and
it is only the Au-Si interaction that changes upon oxidation. Since
monolayer oxidation severs all Au-Si bonds, a completely
“transparent” physisorbed alkylsiloxane layer remains on top of the
reconstructed Au(111)-23×√3 surface.
BEAMLINE U8B
FUNDING National Science Foundation RHK Technology,
Inc. Division of Materials Sciences and Division of Chemical
Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy.
PUBLICATION Kevin S. Schneider, Thomas M. Owens, Daniel
R. Fosnacht, Bradford G. Orr, and Mark M. Banaszak Holl, “The Case
of the Disappearing Monolayer: Alkylsilane Monolayer Formation,
Oxidation, and Subsequent Transparency to Scanning Tunneling
Microscopy,” ChemPhysChem, 4, 111-1114,
(2003). FOR MORE INFORMATION Mark M. Banaszak
Holl Chemistry Department and Applied Physics
Program University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Email: mbanasza@umich.edu
|